There is no shortage of smart homes in Culcheth, but this converted former chapel on Hob Hey Lane certainly brings a bit more drama than the average four-bedroom listing. Dating back to 1849, it has been extended and refurbished, while keeping enough of its original character to avoid looking like a bland new-build in fancy dress.
The entrance hall is described as grand and “jaw-dropping”, which is estate-agent language we usually approach with the caution reserved for unexplained noises in old buildings. In this case, though, the stained-glass windows, including one stretching more than 14ft, appear to have earned the theatrical billing.
The ground floor includes a lounge, family room, WC, dining kitchen and sitting area, plus a utility room. So there is space for entertaining, relaxing and hiding the laundry when visitors arrive, which remains one of the great tests of any successful home.
Upstairs, the master bedroom suite features an original knave arch recessed area as its “striking focal point”, along with an en-suite. There are also three further double bedrooms and a family bathroom, making this a substantial family property rather than merely a pretty piece of local history.
Outside, the home has an attractive garden, courtyard and timber shed. The garden and courtyard sound particularly appealing, although at £800,000, buyers may reasonably expect the shed to offer at least a small glimpse of architectural ambition too.
A spokesperson for estate agent Miller Metcalfe said: “An absolutely exquisite extended and refurbished converted chapel which has been lovingly finished to an exceptional standard whilst still retaining much of the original character.” That is a glowing assessment, but the surviving stained glass and historic features do give the property more personality than most homes currently competing for attention.
The property is listed on Rightmove for £800,000. For more information, call 01920 455430.
The original article was written by Lois Dean, Senior Reporter, and included a disclaimer stating that it was produced through an exclusive subscriber partnership with USA Today and written by American colleagues, meaning it did not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald.